The robustness of eye–mouth index as an eye-tracking metric of social attention in toddlers

Nicholas E. Souter, Sudha Arunachalam, Rhiannon J. Luyster

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Eye-tracking research on social attention in infants and toddlers has included heterogeneous stimuli and analysis techniques. This allows measurement of looking to inner facial features under diverse conditions but restricts across-study comparisons. Eye–mouth index (EMI) is a measure of relative preference for looking to the eyes or mouth, independent of time spent attending to the face. The current study assessed whether EMI was more robust to differences in stimulus type than percent dwell time (PDT) toward the eyes, mouth, and face. Participants were typically developing toddlers aged 18–30 months (N = 58). Stimuli were dynamic videos with single and multiple actors. It was hypothesized that stimulus type would affect PDT to the face, eyes, and mouth, but not EMI. Generalized estimating equations demonstrated that all measures including EMI were influenced by stimulus type. Nevertheless, planned contrasts suggested that EMI was more robust than PDT when comparing heterogeneous stimuli. EMI may allow for a more robust comparison of social attention to inner facial features across eye-tracking studies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)469-478
Number of pages10
JournalInternational Journal of Behavioral Development
Volume44
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2020

Keywords

  • EMI
  • Eye-tracking
  • eye–mouth index
  • social attention
  • stimuli
  • stimulus
  • toddlers
  • typically developing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Education
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Developmental Neuroscience
  • Life-span and Life-course Studies

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The robustness of eye–mouth index as an eye-tracking metric of social attention in toddlers'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this