TY - JOUR
T1 - The role of social cues in the deployment of spatial attention
T2 - Head-body relationships automatically activate directional spatial codes in a simon task
AU - Pomianowska, Iwona
AU - Germeys, Filip
AU - Verfaillie, Karl
AU - Newell, Fiona N.
PY - 2012/1
Y1 - 2012/1
N2 - The role of body orientation in the orienting and allocation of social attention was examined using an adapted Simon paradigm. Participants categorized the facial expression of forward facing, computer-generated human figures by pressing one of two response keys, each located left or right of the observers body midline, while the orientation of the stimulus figure's body (trunk, arms, and legs), which was the taskirrelevant feature of interest, was manipulated (oriented towards the left or right visual hemifield) with respect to the spatial location of the required response. We found that when the orientation of the body was compatible with the required response location, responses were slower relative to when body orientation was incompatible with the response location. In line with a model put forward by Hietanen (1999), this reverse compatibility effect suggests that body orientation is automatically processed into a directional spatial code, but that this code is based on an integration of head and body orientation within an allocentric-based frame of reference. Moreover, we argue that this code may be derived from the motion information implied in the image of a figure when head and body orientation are incongruent. Our results have implications for understanding the nature of the information that affects the allocation of attention for social orienting.
AB - The role of body orientation in the orienting and allocation of social attention was examined using an adapted Simon paradigm. Participants categorized the facial expression of forward facing, computer-generated human figures by pressing one of two response keys, each located left or right of the observers body midline, while the orientation of the stimulus figure's body (trunk, arms, and legs), which was the taskirrelevant feature of interest, was manipulated (oriented towards the left or right visual hemifield) with respect to the spatial location of the required response. We found that when the orientation of the body was compatible with the required response location, responses were slower relative to when body orientation was incompatible with the response location. In line with a model put forward by Hietanen (1999), this reverse compatibility effect suggests that body orientation is automatically processed into a directional spatial code, but that this code is based on an integration of head and body orientation within an allocentric-based frame of reference. Moreover, we argue that this code may be derived from the motion information implied in the image of a figure when head and body orientation are incongruent. Our results have implications for understanding the nature of the information that affects the allocation of attention for social orienting.
KW - Head-body orientation
KW - Implied motion
KW - Simon task
KW - Social attention
KW - Spatial attention
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84856045795&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84856045795&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3389/fnint.2012.00004
DO - 10.3389/fnint.2012.00004
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84856045795
SN - 1662-5145
JO - Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience
JF - Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience
IS - JANUARY 2012
ER -