TY - JOUR
T1 - The use of liners under amalgam restorations
T2 - An in vitro study on marginal leakage
AU - Marchiori, Silvana
AU - Baratieri, Luiz Narciso
AU - De Andrada, Mauro Amaral Caldeira
AU - Monteiro, Sylvio
AU - Ritter, André Vicente
PY - 1998/10
Y1 - 1998/10
N2 - Objective: Marginal leakage of amalgam restorations may lead to secondary caries and pulpal damage. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect various cavity liners might have on microleakage. Method and materials: Mesio-occlusodistal amalgam restorations with margins on enamel and dentin were treated with different liner materials (an adhesive system, a topical fluoride gel, a cavity varnish, and a glass-ionomer cement) in vitro. Following restoration, the teeth were submitted to thermocycling in a stained solution and sectioned to allow assessment of microleakage. Results: On enamel, the control group (no liner) and the glass-ionomer-lined group had equivalent leakage scores and were superior to every other group. On dentin, only the glass-ionomer specimens had superior performance. The cavity varnish and fluoride-lined specimens exhibited the highest leakage scores. Conclusion: The use of liners does not reduce microleakage on amalgam restorations when the cavity margins remain on enamel. On dentin margins, a glass-ionomer liner can reduce microleakage.
AB - Objective: Marginal leakage of amalgam restorations may lead to secondary caries and pulpal damage. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect various cavity liners might have on microleakage. Method and materials: Mesio-occlusodistal amalgam restorations with margins on enamel and dentin were treated with different liner materials (an adhesive system, a topical fluoride gel, a cavity varnish, and a glass-ionomer cement) in vitro. Following restoration, the teeth were submitted to thermocycling in a stained solution and sectioned to allow assessment of microleakage. Results: On enamel, the control group (no liner) and the glass-ionomer-lined group had equivalent leakage scores and were superior to every other group. On dentin, only the glass-ionomer specimens had superior performance. The cavity varnish and fluoride-lined specimens exhibited the highest leakage scores. Conclusion: The use of liners does not reduce microleakage on amalgam restorations when the cavity margins remain on enamel. On dentin margins, a glass-ionomer liner can reduce microleakage.
KW - Amalgam restoration
KW - Cavity liner
KW - Marginal leakage
KW - Microleakage
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032175336&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032175336&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Article
C2 - 9922761
AN - SCOPUS:0032175336
SN - 0033-6572
VL - 29
SP - 637
EP - 642
JO - Quintessence international
JF - Quintessence international
IS - 10
ER -