The validity of hospital diagnostic and procedure codes reflecting morbidity in preterm neonates born <32 weeks gestation

Kelli K. Ryckman, Paul J. Holdefer, Eva Sileo, Claire Carlson, Nancy Weathers, Elizabeth A. Jasper, Hyunkeun Cho, Scott P. Oltman, John M. Dagle, Laura L. Jelliffe-Pawlowski, Elizabeth E. Rogers

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Objective: To determine the validity of diagnostic hospital billing codes for complications of prematurity in neonates <32 weeks gestation. Study Design: Retrospective cohort data from discharge summaries and clinical notes (n = 160) were reviewed by trained, blinded abstractors for the presence of intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) grades 3 or 4, periventricular leukomalacia (PVL), necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), stage 3 or higher, retinopathy of prematurity (ROP), and surgery for NEC or ROP. Data were compared to diagnostic billing codes from the neonatal electronic health record. Results: IVH, PVL, ROP and ROP surgery had strong positive predictive values (PPV > 75%) and excellent negative predictive values (NPV > 95%). The PPVs for NEC (66.7%) and NEC surgery (37.1%) were low. Conclusion: Diagnostic hospital billing codes were observed to be a valid metric to evaluate preterm neonatal morbidities and surgeries except in the instance of more ambiguous diagnoses such as NEC and NEC surgery.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1374-1378
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Perinatology
Volume43
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2023

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The validity of hospital diagnostic and procedure codes reflecting morbidity in preterm neonates born <32 weeks gestation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this