The value of checklists

TY - JOUR

T1 - The value of checklists

AU - Tokede, Oluwabunmi

AU - Ramoni, Rachel

AU - Kalenderian, Elsbeth

N1 - Funding Information: Oluwabunmi Tokede BDS, MPH Instructor Rachel Ramoni DDS, ScD Assistant Professor Elsbeth Kalenderian DDS, MPH, PhD Associate Professor and Chair Oral Health Policy and Epidemiology, Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Boston Oral Health Policy and Epidemiology Harvard School of Dental Medicine Boston It is with great interest that we read Dr. Christman and colleagues’ article, “Designing a Safety Checklist for Dental Implant Placement: A Delphi Study” ( JADA 2014;145[2]:131-140 ), which described the development of a checklist to standardize the process of dental implant placement. Although the concern for preventing patient harm is fundamental to the practice of medicine, the 2000 publication of “To Err Is Human: Building a Safer Health System,” 1 by the Committee on Quality of Health Care in America of the Institute of Medicine, catalyzed a patient safety and quality revolution. Against this backdrop, checklists have emerged as practical and effective tools for realizing a safer health care environment. Checklists support team members by presenting critical tasks as a list, a format that simplifies understanding and recall of information. Long used in aviation, checklists increasingly are being relied on in medicine to reduce the occurrence of errors of omission, create reliable evaluations, and improve quality and use of best practices. 2 Dentistry has lagged behind in the attention paid to safety, and the use of checklists within the dental world is almost nonexistent. Dr. Christman and colleagues’ work, therefore, is an encouraging step forward. As the authors suggest, it is critical to test the safety checklist in a clinical environment to establish its functionality and compatibility with task execution. Beyond that, regardless of the systematic approach used in the design of this checklist, perhaps the most important determinant of its success will be how it is implemented. 3 Target users must have a full understanding of the purpose of the checklist, and they must be trained in how to use it. 3 Usefulness of the checklist also requires support of all staff, dedicated champions and endorsement by clinic leaders. Along the same lines, we have been fortunate to obtain a grant (1R21DE023408-01A1) from the National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research titled “Improving the Quality of Dental Care by Implementing a Clinician Checklist.” In a pilot work, we observed that a record of fundamental tasks that directly affect the quality of dental care (such as updating the medical history and medication history) often is missing from patient records. This implies that although most dental care providers agree on what constitutes basic best practices, they often fail to complete and/or document the associated tasks. We are developing a checklist that will be implemented to support clinical dental team members in consistently performing and documenting these tasks. Again, we are excited that momentum is being generated regarding the topic of patient safety in dentistry. We congratulate Dr. Christman and colleagues for their pioneering work and look forward to learning about the quality improvement that accompanies the implementation of this implant checklist.

PY - 2014/7

Y1 - 2014/7

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84905587902&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84905587902&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0002-8177(14)60075-1

DO - 10.1016/S0002-8177(14)60075-1

M3 - Letter

C2 - 24982269

AN - SCOPUS:84905587902

SN - 0002-8177

VL - 145

SP - 696

EP - 697

JO - Journal of the American Dental Association

JF - Journal of the American Dental Association

IS - 7

ER -