“Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image”: The distance dependence of representation

Elinor Amit, Daniel Algom, Yaacov Trope, Nira Liberman

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter


The prohibition in the Bible against pictorial representations of God is as famous as it is poorly understood. After all, why is it forbidden to depict God in pictures, but it is not forbidden to depict God in words (cf. Halbertal & Margalit, 1992)? God has been richly represented in written or oral narratives in and out of the Bible. If so, why is it permitted to write about God’s hand or face, while it is strictly forbidden to provide a drawing of the hand or the face? In a similar vein, God can be heard, but not seen “for man may not see Me and live” (Exodus, 33:20). Again, it is the visual image that is banned. Portrayals in words are not only endorsed, but actively sought. One can listen to (indeed, should follow) God’s words and one is encouraged to sing/write God’s virtues. In the tradition of Islam, the prohibition against pictorial representation extends beyond God to such a major prophet as Muhammad. The ban on pictorial depiction also is common in the political realm. Kings of Persia would speak to their subjects from behind a screen and were never seen. The reverse asymmetry is also well known in modern politics: Pictures of the king/dictator are distributed everywhere, but one is discouraged to write/talk about the ruler (beyond the simplest banalities) (again, see Halbertal & Margalit, 1992, for a discussion of the biblical prohibition).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationHandbook of Imagination and Mental Simulation
PublisherTaylor and Francis
Number of pages16
ISBN (Electronic)9781136678103
ISBN (Print)1841698873, 9781841698878
StatePublished - Jan 1 2012

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Psychology


Dive into the research topics of '“Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image”: The distance dependence of representation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this