TY - JOUR
T1 - Three challenges for connecting model to mechanism in decision-making
AU - Churchland, Anne K.
AU - Kiani, Roozbeh
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank Braden Purcell and Gouki Okazawa for useful discussions and insightful comments. This work was supported by the Simons Collaboration on the Global Brain (AKC & RK), R01EY022979 (AKC), R01MH109180 (RK), the Pew Foundation (AKC), and the Klingenstein Foundation (AKC).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Elsevier Ltd.
Copyright:
Copyright 2018 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2016/10/1
Y1 - 2016/10/1
N2 - Recent years have seen a growing interest in understanding the neural mechanisms that support decision-making. The advent of new tools for measuring and manipulating neurons, alongside the inclusion of multiple new animal models and sensory systems has led to the generation of many novel datasets. The potential for these new approaches to constrain decision-making models is unprecedented. Here, we argue that to fully leverage these new approaches, three challenges must be met. First, experimenters must design well-controlled behavioral experiments that make it possible to distinguish competing behavioral strategies. Second, analyses of neural responses should think beyond single neurons, taking into account tradeoffs of single-trial versus trial-averaged approaches. Finally, quantitative model comparisons should be used, but must consider common obstacles.
AB - Recent years have seen a growing interest in understanding the neural mechanisms that support decision-making. The advent of new tools for measuring and manipulating neurons, alongside the inclusion of multiple new animal models and sensory systems has led to the generation of many novel datasets. The potential for these new approaches to constrain decision-making models is unprecedented. Here, we argue that to fully leverage these new approaches, three challenges must be met. First, experimenters must design well-controlled behavioral experiments that make it possible to distinguish competing behavioral strategies. Second, analyses of neural responses should think beyond single neurons, taking into account tradeoffs of single-trial versus trial-averaged approaches. Finally, quantitative model comparisons should be used, but must consider common obstacles.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84975529468&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84975529468&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.cobeha.2016.06.008
DO - 10.1016/j.cobeha.2016.06.008
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:84975529468
SN - 2352-1546
VL - 11
SP - 74
EP - 80
JO - Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences
JF - Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences
ER -