TY - GEN
T1 - Tight bounds for linkages in planar graphs
AU - Adler, Isolde
AU - Kolliopoulos, Stavros G.
AU - Krause, Philipp Klaus
AU - Lokshtanov, Daniel
AU - Saurabh, Saket
AU - Thilikos, Dimitrios
PY - 2011
Y1 - 2011
N2 - The Disjoint-Paths Problem asks, given a graph G and a set of pairs of terminals (s 1,t 1),...,(s k ,t k ), whether there is a collection of k pairwise vertex-disjoint paths linking s i and t i , for i = 1,...,k. In their f(k)•n 3 algorithm for this problem, Robertson and Seymour introduced the irrelevant vertex technique according to which in every instance of treewidth greater than g(k) there is an "irrelevant" vertex whose removal creates an equivalent instance of the problem. This fact is based on the celebrated Unique Linkage Theorem, whose - very technical - proof gives a function g(k) that is responsible for an immense parameter dependence in the running time of the algorithm. In this paper we prove this result for planar graphs achieving g(k) = 2 O(k). Our bound is radically better than the bounds known for general graphs. Moreover, our proof is new and self-contained, and it strongly exploits the combinatorial properties of planar graphs. We also prove that our result is optimal, in the sense that the function g(k) cannot become better than exponential. Our results suggest that any algorithm for the Disjoint-Paths Problem that runs in time better than will probably require drastically different ideas from those in the irrelevant vertex technique.
AB - The Disjoint-Paths Problem asks, given a graph G and a set of pairs of terminals (s 1,t 1),...,(s k ,t k ), whether there is a collection of k pairwise vertex-disjoint paths linking s i and t i , for i = 1,...,k. In their f(k)•n 3 algorithm for this problem, Robertson and Seymour introduced the irrelevant vertex technique according to which in every instance of treewidth greater than g(k) there is an "irrelevant" vertex whose removal creates an equivalent instance of the problem. This fact is based on the celebrated Unique Linkage Theorem, whose - very technical - proof gives a function g(k) that is responsible for an immense parameter dependence in the running time of the algorithm. In this paper we prove this result for planar graphs achieving g(k) = 2 O(k). Our bound is radically better than the bounds known for general graphs. Moreover, our proof is new and self-contained, and it strongly exploits the combinatorial properties of planar graphs. We also prove that our result is optimal, in the sense that the function g(k) cannot become better than exponential. Our results suggest that any algorithm for the Disjoint-Paths Problem that runs in time better than will probably require drastically different ideas from those in the irrelevant vertex technique.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79959986071&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79959986071&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/978-3-642-22006-7_10
DO - 10.1007/978-3-642-22006-7_10
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:79959986071
SN - 9783642220050
T3 - Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)
SP - 110
EP - 121
BT - Automata, Languages and Programming - 38th International Colloquium, ICALP 2011, Proceedings
T2 - 38th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages and Programming, ICALP 2011
Y2 - 4 July 2011 through 8 July 2011
ER -