Toward a Clinically Relevant Model of Counseling Research: Comment on Patton, Kivlighan, and Multon (1997) and Gelso, Kivlighan, Wine, Jones, and Friedman (1997)

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

This response to the articles by M. J. Patton, D. M. Kivlighan, and K. D. Multon (1997) and C. J. Gelso, D. M. Kivlighan, B. Wine, A. Jones, and S. C. Friedman (1997) focuses on the significance and timeliness of these studies, elements of an emerging model for counseling research, the current context of psychoanalytic theory relevant to the counseling and research models of these studies, and measurement of clinical constructs. A broader, though not exhaustive, set of constructs useful for research and practice in psychoanalytic counseling is suggested.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)218-221
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Counseling Psychology
Volume44
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1997

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Toward a Clinically Relevant Model of Counseling Research: Comment on Patton, Kivlighan, and Multon (1997) and Gelso, Kivlighan, Wine, Jones, and Friedman (1997)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this