Toward a Sociology of Nature

Colin Jerolmack

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


    Although we often believe that nature stands apart from social life, our experience of nature is profoundly social. This paper unpacks this paradox in order to (1) explain sociology's neglect of the environment and (2) introduce the articles in this special issue on "the sociology of nature." I argue that sociology's disinterest in the biophysical world is a legacy of its classical concern with tracing society's "Great Transformation" from gemeinschaft to gesellschaft: while early anthropologists studied "primitive" societies that allegedly had not yet completed "the passage from nature to culture" (Lévi-Strauss : 99), pioneering sociologists presumed that industrialization and urbanization liberated "modern" society from nature and therefore focused their attention on "urbanism as a way of life" (Wirth ). As exemplified by the articles in this symposium, environmental sociology critiques the nature-culture and town-country dualisms. One of environmental sociology's core contributions has been demonstrating that nature is just as much a social construction as race or gender; however, its more profound challenge to the discipline lies in its refutation of the sociological axiom that social facts can be explained purely through reference to other social facts. "Environmental facts" are a constitutive feature of social life, not merely an effect of it.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)501-505
    Number of pages5
    JournalSociological Quarterly
    Issue number4
    StatePublished - Sep 2012

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Sociology and Political Science


    Dive into the research topics of 'Toward a Sociology of Nature'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this