TY - JOUR
T1 - Toward Robust Anxiety Biomarkers
T2 - A Machine Learning Approach in a Large-Scale Sample
AU - Boeke, Emily A.
AU - Holmes, Avram J.
AU - Phelps, Elizabeth A.
N1 - Funding Information:
Data were provided by the Brain Genomics Superstruct Project of Harvard University and the Massachusetts General Hospital (Principal Investigators: Randy Buckner, Joshua Roffman, and Jordan Smoller), with support from the Center for Brain Science Neuroinformatics Research Group , the Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging , and the Center for Human Genetic Research . Twenty individual investigators at Harvard and Massachusetts General Hospital generously contributed data to the overall project. We thank Annabel Boeke for suggesting examples of nonpsychiatric biomarkers.
Funding Information:
This work was supported by the National Institute on Drug Abuse (Grant No. R01 DA042855 [to EAP]). Data were provided by the Brain Genomics Superstruct Project of Harvard University and the Massachusetts General Hospital (Principal Investigators: Randy Buckner, Joshua Roffman, and Jordan Smoller), with support from the Center for Brain Science Neuroinformatics Research Group, the Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, and the Center for Human Genetic Research. Twenty individual investigators at Harvard and Massachusetts General Hospital generously contributed data to the overall project. We thank Annabel Boeke for suggesting examples of nonpsychiatric biomarkers. The authors declare no biomedical financial interests or potential conflicts of interest.
Funding Information:
This work was supported by the National Institute on Drug Abuse (Grant No. R01 DA042855 [to EAP]).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Society of Biological Psychiatry
PY - 2020/8
Y1 - 2020/8
N2 - Background: The field of psychiatry has long sought biomarkers that can objectively diagnose patients, predict treatment response, or identify individuals at risk of illness onset. However, reliable psychiatric biomarkers have yet to emerge. The recent application of machine learning techniques to develop neuroimaging-based biomarkers has yielded promising preliminary results. However, much of the work in this domain has not met best practice standards from the field of machine learning. This is especially true for studies of anxiety, creating uncertainty about the potential for anxiety biomarker development. Methods: We applied machine learning tools to predict trait anxiety from neuroimaging measurements in humans. Using publicly available data from the Brain Genomics Superstruct Project, we compared a suite of neuroimaging-based machine learning models predicting anxiety within a discovery sample (n = 531, 307 women) via k-fold cross-validation, and we tested the final model (a stacked model incorporating region-to-region functional connectivity, amygdala seed-to-voxel connectivity, and volumetric and cortical thickness data) in a held-out, unseen test sample (n = 348, 209 women). Results: Though the best model was able to predict anxiety within the discovery sample (cross-validated R2 of .06, permutation test p < .001), the generalization test within the holdout sample failed (R2 of −.04, permutation test p > .05). Conclusions: In this study, we did not find evidence of a generalizable anxiety biomarker. However, we encourage other researchers to investigate this topic, utilizing large samples and proper methodology, to clarify the potential of neuroimaging-based anxiety biomarkers.
AB - Background: The field of psychiatry has long sought biomarkers that can objectively diagnose patients, predict treatment response, or identify individuals at risk of illness onset. However, reliable psychiatric biomarkers have yet to emerge. The recent application of machine learning techniques to develop neuroimaging-based biomarkers has yielded promising preliminary results. However, much of the work in this domain has not met best practice standards from the field of machine learning. This is especially true for studies of anxiety, creating uncertainty about the potential for anxiety biomarker development. Methods: We applied machine learning tools to predict trait anxiety from neuroimaging measurements in humans. Using publicly available data from the Brain Genomics Superstruct Project, we compared a suite of neuroimaging-based machine learning models predicting anxiety within a discovery sample (n = 531, 307 women) via k-fold cross-validation, and we tested the final model (a stacked model incorporating region-to-region functional connectivity, amygdala seed-to-voxel connectivity, and volumetric and cortical thickness data) in a held-out, unseen test sample (n = 348, 209 women). Results: Though the best model was able to predict anxiety within the discovery sample (cross-validated R2 of .06, permutation test p < .001), the generalization test within the holdout sample failed (R2 of −.04, permutation test p > .05). Conclusions: In this study, we did not find evidence of a generalizable anxiety biomarker. However, we encourage other researchers to investigate this topic, utilizing large samples and proper methodology, to clarify the potential of neuroimaging-based anxiety biomarkers.
KW - Anxiety
KW - Biomarker
KW - Functional connectivity
KW - Machine learning
KW - Predictive modeling
KW - fMRI
KW - Neuroimaging
KW - Brain/diagnostic imaging
KW - Humans
KW - Biomarkers
KW - Female
KW - Machine Learning
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85070909687&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85070909687&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.bpsc.2019.05.018
DO - 10.1016/j.bpsc.2019.05.018
M3 - Article
C2 - 31447329
AN - SCOPUS:85070909687
SN - 2451-9022
VL - 5
SP - 799
EP - 807
JO - Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
JF - Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
IS - 8
ER -