TY - JOUR
T1 - Traversing psychological distance
AU - Liberman, Nira
AU - Trope, Yaacov
N1 - Funding Information:
The research reported in this paper was supported by US-Israel Binational Science Foundation Grant #2011-080 to N.L. and Y.T., by the I-CORE Program of the Planning and Budgeting Committee and The Israel Science Foundation (grant No. 51/11) to N.L., and by the National Science Foundation Award #BCS-1053128 and the John Templeton Foundation Award # FB49739-A to Y.T.
PY - 2014/7
Y1 - 2014/7
N2 - Traversing psychological distance involves going beyond direct experience, and includes planning, perspective taking, and contemplating counterfactuals. Consistent with this view, temporal, spatial, and social distances as well as hypotheticality are associated, affect each other, and are inferred from one another. Moreover, traversing all distances involves the use of abstraction, which we define as forming a belief about the substitutability for a specific purpose of subjectively distinct objects. Indeed, across many instances of both abstraction and psychological distancing, more abstract constructs are used for more distal objects. Here, we describe the implications of this relation for prediction, choice, communication, negotiation, and self-control. We ask whether traversing distance is a general mental ability and whether distance should replace expectancy in expected-utility theories.
AB - Traversing psychological distance involves going beyond direct experience, and includes planning, perspective taking, and contemplating counterfactuals. Consistent with this view, temporal, spatial, and social distances as well as hypotheticality are associated, affect each other, and are inferred from one another. Moreover, traversing all distances involves the use of abstraction, which we define as forming a belief about the substitutability for a specific purpose of subjectively distinct objects. Indeed, across many instances of both abstraction and psychological distancing, more abstract constructs are used for more distal objects. Here, we describe the implications of this relation for prediction, choice, communication, negotiation, and self-control. We ask whether traversing distance is a general mental ability and whether distance should replace expectancy in expected-utility theories.
KW - Abstraction
KW - Construal level theory
KW - Psychological distance
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84903156376&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84903156376&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.tics.2014.03.001
DO - 10.1016/j.tics.2014.03.001
M3 - Review article
C2 - 24726527
AN - SCOPUS:84903156376
SN - 1364-6613
VL - 18
SP - 364
EP - 369
JO - Trends in Cognitive Sciences
JF - Trends in Cognitive Sciences
IS - 7
ER -