Trends and characteristics of proposed and enacted state legislation on childhood vaccination exemption, 2011–2017

Neal D. Goldstein, Joanna S. Suder, Jonathan Purtle

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Objectives. To examine trends and characteristics of proposed and enacted state legislation that would directly affect states’ immunization exemption laws. Methods. We performed content analysis of proposed bills in state legislatures from 2011 to 2017. We classified bills as provaccination or antivaccination. Results. State legislators proposed 175 bills, with the volume increasing over time: 92 (53%) bills expanded access to exemptions, and 83 (47%) limited the ability to exempt. Of the 13 bills signed into law, 12 (92%) limited the ability to exempt. Bills that expanded access to exemptions were more likely to come from Republican legislators and Northeastern and Southern states. Conclusions. Although most proposed legislation would have expanded access to exemptions, bills that limited exemptions were more likely to be enacted into law. Legal barriers to exempt one’s children from vaccination persist despite vaccine hesitancy, which is encouraging for public health. Public Health Implications. Most vaccine exemption laws introduced in state legislatures would pose threats to the public’s health. There is a need for constituents to engage their elected legislators and advocate provaccination policies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)102-107
Number of pages6
JournalAmerican journal of public health
Volume109
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2019

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Trends and characteristics of proposed and enacted state legislation on childhood vaccination exemption, 2011–2017'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this