TY - JOUR
T1 - Understanding Organizations Serving Runaway and Homeless Youth
T2 - A Multi-setting, Multi-perspective Qualitative Exploration
AU - Gwadz, Marya
AU - Freeman, Robert
AU - Leonard, Noelle R.
AU - Kutnick, Alexandra
AU - Silverman, Elizabeth
AU - Ritchie, Amanda
AU - Bolas, James
AU - Cleland, Charles M.
AU - Tabac, Lara
AU - Hirsch, Margo
AU - Powlovich, Jamie
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was supported by the William T. Grant Foundation (#182738). We wish to acknowledge the support, guidance, and training received from the William T. Grant Foundation, including from Kim DuMont, PhD and Nancy Rivera-Torres. We wish to acknowledge the Center for Drug Use and HIV Research (CDUHR; P30 DA011041) for its support of the study, and in particular Aradhana Srinagesh, MPH, Amanda Applegate, Lucia Pattullo, Chris Hilliard, MPH, and Dawa Sherpa, BA for editorial assistance. We also thank Ravi Ramaswamy and Charles Smith, PhD at the David P. Weikart Center for Youth Program Quality for their guidance and training on understanding and assessing program quality, as well as Michelle Gambone, PhD at Youth Development Strategies, Inc.; and Nina Aledort, PhD at the Office of Children and Family Services. We further acknowledge the staff at the settings for runaway and homeless youth who engaged in the study and offered insights into their work, as well as the young people who participated.
Funding Information:
Acknowledgements This study was supported by the William T. Grant Foundation (#182738). We wish to acknowledge the support, guidance, and training received from the William T. Grant Foundation, including from Kim DuMont, PhD and Nancy Rivera-Torres. We wish to acknowledge the Center for Drug Use and HIV Research (CDUHR; P30 DA011041) for its support of the study, and in particular Aradhana Srinagesh, MPH, Amanda Applegate, Lucia Pattullo, Chris Hilliard, MPH, and Dawa Sherpa, BA for editorial assistance. We also thank Ravi Ramaswamy and Charles Smith, PhD at the David P. Weikart Center for Youth Program Quality for their guidance and training on understanding and assessing program quality, as well as Michelle Gambone, PhD at Youth Development Strategies, Inc.; and Nina Ale-dort, PhD at the Office of Children and Family Services. We further acknowledge the staff at the settings for runaway and homeless youth who engaged in the study and offered insights into their work, as well as the young people who participated.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
PY - 2019/4/15
Y1 - 2019/4/15
N2 - Runaway and homeless youth (RHY) are dependent on the specialized settings that locate, engage, and serve them. Yet, little research has focused on the features of effective settings for RHY. The present qualitative study, grounded in the Youth Program Quality Assessment model, explored characteristics of higher quality organizations for RHY and gaps that remain from staff and RHY perspectives. A total of 29 diverse settings serving RHY in New York State were randomly selected for participation, and ranked on a quantitative program quality index. Within settings, we conducted in-depth semi-structured interviews with program administrators (N = 30) and other staff (N = 24). Focus group interviews were conducted with RHY (N = 13 focus groups; N = 84 RHY). Data were analyzed using a systematic content analysis approach that was both theory-driven and inductive, comparing higher to lower quality settings. We found all settings provided vital services and experienced challenges, but higher quality settings ameliorated challenges through (1) a youth-centered program philosophy equally understood by staff and RHY; (2) developmentally appropriate relationships between staff and RHY that promoted autonomy; (3) a focus on short- and long-term goals within anticipated crises; and (4) ongoing internal quality assessment procedures. Within lower quality settings we found (1) difficulties retaining effective staff and (2) a primary focus on basic services and managing crises, but less attention to emotional support, exacerbated by (3) funding and other challenges emerging from the larger environment. The present study extends the literature on organizations for RHY by identifying characteristics of higher quality settings, and challenges that remain.
AB - Runaway and homeless youth (RHY) are dependent on the specialized settings that locate, engage, and serve them. Yet, little research has focused on the features of effective settings for RHY. The present qualitative study, grounded in the Youth Program Quality Assessment model, explored characteristics of higher quality organizations for RHY and gaps that remain from staff and RHY perspectives. A total of 29 diverse settings serving RHY in New York State were randomly selected for participation, and ranked on a quantitative program quality index. Within settings, we conducted in-depth semi-structured interviews with program administrators (N = 30) and other staff (N = 24). Focus group interviews were conducted with RHY (N = 13 focus groups; N = 84 RHY). Data were analyzed using a systematic content analysis approach that was both theory-driven and inductive, comparing higher to lower quality settings. We found all settings provided vital services and experienced challenges, but higher quality settings ameliorated challenges through (1) a youth-centered program philosophy equally understood by staff and RHY; (2) developmentally appropriate relationships between staff and RHY that promoted autonomy; (3) a focus on short- and long-term goals within anticipated crises; and (4) ongoing internal quality assessment procedures. Within lower quality settings we found (1) difficulties retaining effective staff and (2) a primary focus on basic services and managing crises, but less attention to emotional support, exacerbated by (3) funding and other challenges emerging from the larger environment. The present study extends the literature on organizations for RHY by identifying characteristics of higher quality settings, and challenges that remain.
KW - Positive Youth Development
KW - Programs
KW - Qualitative
KW - Runaway and homeless youth
KW - Services
KW - Youth Program Quality Assessment
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049931255&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85049931255&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10560-018-0563-3
DO - 10.1007/s10560-018-0563-3
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85049931255
SN - 0738-0151
VL - 36
SP - 201
EP - 217
JO - Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal
JF - Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal
IS - 2
ER -