TY - JOUR
T1 - Understanding stigma as a barrier to accessing cancer treatment in South Africa
T2 - Implications for public health campaigns
AU - Oystacher, Tatiana
AU - Blasco, Drew
AU - He, Emily
AU - Huang, Debbie
AU - Schear, Rebekkah
AU - McGoldrick, Devon
AU - Link, Bruce
AU - Yang, Lawrence Hsin
N1 - Funding Information:
Work on this project was supported by Livestrong Foundation. Debbie Huang's participation in this study was supported by the grant NIH T32 MH013043 (Mailman School of Public Health Columbia University Psychiatry Epidemiology Training Program).
Publisher Copyright:
© Tatiana Oystacher et al.
PY - 2018/1/24
Y1 - 2018/1/24
N2 - Introduction: Cancer contributes to significant illness burden in South Africa, with delayed diagnosis resulting from limited knowledge of cancer, lack of biomedical treatment and stigma. This study examines ways in which people are identified as having cancer through perspectives of traditional healing or the biomedical model. Additionally, we sought to understand the stigma associated with cancer, including stereotypes, anticipated discrimination and coping styles. Methods: Livestrong Foundation conducted 11 semi-structured focus groups with key community stakeholders in three South African townships. Interviews examined the negative consequences of being labeled with a cancer diagnosis as well as causes of, possible prevention of and barriers and methods to improve access to cancer treatment. Analyses were completed using directed content analysis. Results: Revealed three main labeling mechanisms: physical appearance of perceived signs/symptoms of cancer, diagnosis by a traditional healer, or a biomedical diagnosis by a Western physician. Being labeled led to anticipated discrimination in response to prevalent cancer stereotypes. This contributed to delayed treatment, use of traditional healers instead of biomedical treatment and secrecy of symptoms and/or diagnosis. Further, perceptions of cancer were commonly conflated with HIV/TB owing to prior educational campaigns. Conclusion: Our study deepens the understanding of the cancer labeling process in South Africa and the resulting negative effects of stigma. Future anti-stigma interventions should partner with traditional healers due to their respected community status and consider how previous health interventions may significantly impact current understandings of illness.
AB - Introduction: Cancer contributes to significant illness burden in South Africa, with delayed diagnosis resulting from limited knowledge of cancer, lack of biomedical treatment and stigma. This study examines ways in which people are identified as having cancer through perspectives of traditional healing or the biomedical model. Additionally, we sought to understand the stigma associated with cancer, including stereotypes, anticipated discrimination and coping styles. Methods: Livestrong Foundation conducted 11 semi-structured focus groups with key community stakeholders in three South African townships. Interviews examined the negative consequences of being labeled with a cancer diagnosis as well as causes of, possible prevention of and barriers and methods to improve access to cancer treatment. Analyses were completed using directed content analysis. Results: Revealed three main labeling mechanisms: physical appearance of perceived signs/symptoms of cancer, diagnosis by a traditional healer, or a biomedical diagnosis by a Western physician. Being labeled led to anticipated discrimination in response to prevalent cancer stereotypes. This contributed to delayed treatment, use of traditional healers instead of biomedical treatment and secrecy of symptoms and/or diagnosis. Further, perceptions of cancer were commonly conflated with HIV/TB owing to prior educational campaigns. Conclusion: Our study deepens the understanding of the cancer labeling process in South Africa and the resulting negative effects of stigma. Future anti-stigma interventions should partner with traditional healers due to their respected community status and consider how previous health interventions may significantly impact current understandings of illness.
KW - Cancer
KW - Knowledge
KW - Modified labeling theory
KW - South Africa
KW - Stigma
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85044601418&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85044601418&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.11604/pamj.2018.29.73.14399
DO - 10.11604/pamj.2018.29.73.14399
M3 - Article
C2 - 29875954
AN - SCOPUS:85044601418
SN - 1937-8688
VL - 29
JO - Pan African Medical Journal
JF - Pan African Medical Journal
M1 - 73
ER -