Unpacking Clinical Supervision in Transitional and Permanent Supportive Housing: Scrutiny or Support?

Mimi Choy-Brown; Victoria Stanhope; Emmy Tiderington; Deborah K. Padgett

doi:10.1007/s10488-015-0665-6

Unpacking Clinical Supervision in Transitional and Permanent Supportive Housing: Scrutiny or Support?

Mimi Choy-Brown, Victoria Stanhope, Emmy Tiderington, Deborah K. Padgett

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Behavioral health organizations use clinical supervision to ensure professional development and practice quality. This qualitative study examined 35 service coordinators’ perspectives on supervision in two distinct supportive housing program types (permanent and transitional). Thematic analysis of in-depth interviews yielded three contrast themes: support versus scrutiny, planned versus impromptu time, and housing first versus treatment first. Supervisory content and format resulted in differential perceptions of supervision, thereby influencing opportunities for learning. These findings suggest that unpacking discrete elements of supervision enactment in usual care settings can inform implementation of recovery-oriented practice.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	546-554
Number of pages	9
Journal	Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research
Volume	43
Issue number	4
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-015-0665-6
State	Published - Jul 1 2016

Keywords

Mental health recovery
Qualitative
Supervision
Supportive housing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Phychiatric Mental Health
Health Policy
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Psychiatry and Mental health

Access to Document

10.1007/s10488-015-0665-6

Cite this

@article{4fd2ce9ca3f44253b5e6e391627a64ce,

title = "Unpacking Clinical Supervision in Transitional and Permanent Supportive Housing: Scrutiny or Support?",

abstract = "Behavioral health organizations use clinical supervision to ensure professional development and practice quality. This qualitative study examined 35 service coordinators{\textquoteright} perspectives on supervision in two distinct supportive housing program types (permanent and transitional). Thematic analysis of in-depth interviews yielded three contrast themes: support versus scrutiny, planned versus impromptu time, and housing first versus treatment first. Supervisory content and format resulted in differential perceptions of supervision, thereby influencing opportunities for learning. These findings suggest that unpacking discrete elements of supervision enactment in usual care settings can inform implementation of recovery-oriented practice.",

keywords = "Mental health recovery, Qualitative, Supervision, Supportive housing",

author = "Mimi Choy-Brown and Victoria Stanhope and Emmy Tiderington and Padgett, {Deborah K.}",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2015, Springer Science+Business Media New York.",

year = "2016",

month = jul,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1007/s10488-015-0665-6",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "43",

pages = "546--554",

journal = "Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research",

issn = "0894-587X",

publisher = "Springer New York",

number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Unpacking Clinical Supervision in Transitional and Permanent Supportive Housing

T2 - Scrutiny or Support?

AU - Choy-Brown, Mimi

AU - Stanhope, Victoria

AU - Tiderington, Emmy

AU - Padgett, Deborah K.

PY - 2016/7/1

Y1 - 2016/7/1

N2 - Behavioral health organizations use clinical supervision to ensure professional development and practice quality. This qualitative study examined 35 service coordinators’ perspectives on supervision in two distinct supportive housing program types (permanent and transitional). Thematic analysis of in-depth interviews yielded three contrast themes: support versus scrutiny, planned versus impromptu time, and housing first versus treatment first. Supervisory content and format resulted in differential perceptions of supervision, thereby influencing opportunities for learning. These findings suggest that unpacking discrete elements of supervision enactment in usual care settings can inform implementation of recovery-oriented practice.

AB - Behavioral health organizations use clinical supervision to ensure professional development and practice quality. This qualitative study examined 35 service coordinators’ perspectives on supervision in two distinct supportive housing program types (permanent and transitional). Thematic analysis of in-depth interviews yielded three contrast themes: support versus scrutiny, planned versus impromptu time, and housing first versus treatment first. Supervisory content and format resulted in differential perceptions of supervision, thereby influencing opportunities for learning. These findings suggest that unpacking discrete elements of supervision enactment in usual care settings can inform implementation of recovery-oriented practice.

KW - Mental health recovery

KW - Qualitative

KW - Supervision

KW - Supportive housing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84930915621&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84930915621&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10488-015-0665-6

DO - 10.1007/s10488-015-0665-6

M3 - Article

C2 - 26066866

AN - SCOPUS:84930915621

SN - 0894-587X

VL - 43

SP - 546

EP - 554

JO - Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research

JF - Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research

IS - 4

ER -

Unpacking Clinical Supervision in Transitional and Permanent Supportive Housing: Scrutiny or Support?

Abstract

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this