TY - GEN
T1 - Unpacking the relationship between discussion forum participation and learning in MOOCs
T2 - 8th International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, LAK 2018
AU - Wise, Alyssa Friend
AU - Cui, Yi
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank Stanford University and the MOOCPosts Dataset team for their assistance in accessing and working with the data.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Association for Computing Machinery.
PY - 2018/3/7
Y1 - 2018/3/7
N2 - This study examined the relationship between discussion forum contributions and course assessment results in a statistics MOOC. An important feature of the study is that it distinguished between discussions that were related to the learning of course material (“content-related”) and those which were not (“non-content”). Another contribution is that the study evaluated the additional usefulness of social centrality measures in predicting course grade after the quantity of forum contributions has been accounted for. Results showed that, overall, 15% of course learners contributed to the forums and these learners had a significantly higher rate of successfully passing the course than non-contributors (64% vs 32% passing). Learners who made posts to both content-related and non-content threads had a higher passing rate than those who only contributed to one type or the other. Among learners who successfully passed the course, there were no differences in course grade when comparing discussion contributors and non-contributors overall; however those who contributed to content-related threads performed slightly better than those who did not (course grade of 87% vs 85%). A predictive model based on the number of posts made to content-related threads explained a small proportion of variance in course grades; addition of social centrality measures did not significantly improve the variance explained by the model.
AB - This study examined the relationship between discussion forum contributions and course assessment results in a statistics MOOC. An important feature of the study is that it distinguished between discussions that were related to the learning of course material (“content-related”) and those which were not (“non-content”). Another contribution is that the study evaluated the additional usefulness of social centrality measures in predicting course grade after the quantity of forum contributions has been accounted for. Results showed that, overall, 15% of course learners contributed to the forums and these learners had a significantly higher rate of successfully passing the course than non-contributors (64% vs 32% passing). Learners who made posts to both content-related and non-content threads had a higher passing rate than those who only contributed to one type or the other. Among learners who successfully passed the course, there were no differences in course grade when comparing discussion contributors and non-contributors overall; however those who contributed to content-related threads performed slightly better than those who did not (course grade of 87% vs 85%). A predictive model based on the number of posts made to content-related threads explained a small proportion of variance in course grades; addition of social centrality measures did not significantly improve the variance explained by the model.
KW - Discussion forum
KW - Learning outcomes
KW - Massive open online courses
KW - Social network analysis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85045559488&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85045559488&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1145/3170358.3170403
DO - 10.1145/3170358.3170403
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85045559488
T3 - ACM International Conference Proceeding Series
SP - 330
EP - 339
BT - Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge
PB - Association for Computing Machinery
Y2 - 5 March 2018 through 9 March 2018
ER -