TY - JOUR
T1 - Unsupervised ensembling of multiple software sensors with phase synchronization
T2 - a robust approach for electrocardiogram-derived respiration
AU - McErlean, Jacob
AU - Malik, John
AU - Lin, Yu Ting
AU - Talmon, Ronen
AU - Wu, Hau Tieng
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine
PY - 2024/3/1
Y1 - 2024/3/1
N2 - Objective. We aimed to fuse the outputs of different electrocardiogram-derived respiration (EDR) algorithms to create one higher quality EDR signal. Methods. We viewed each EDR algorithm as a software sensor that recorded breathing activity from a different vantage point, identified high-quality software sensors based on the respiratory signal quality index, aligned the highest-quality EDRs with a phase synchronization technique based on the graph connection Laplacian, and finally fused those aligned, high-quality EDRs. We refer to the output as the sync-ensembled EDR signal. The proposed algorithm was evaluated on two large-scale databases of whole-night polysomnograms. We evaluated the performance of the proposed algorithm using three respiratory signals recorded from different hardware sensors, and compared it with other existing EDR algorithms. A sensitivity analysis was carried out for a total of five cases: fusion by taking the mean of EDR signals, and the four cases of EDR signal alignment without and with synchronization and without and with signal quality selection. Results. The sync-ensembled EDR algorithm outperforms existing EDR algorithms when evaluated by the synchronized correlation ( γ -score), optimal transport (OT) distance, and estimated average respiratory rate score, all with statistical significance. The sensitivity analysis shows that the signal quality selection and EDR signal alignment are both critical for the performance, both with statistical significance. Conclusion. The sync-ensembled EDR provides robust respiratory information from electrocardiogram. Significance. Phase synchronization is not only theoretically rigorous but also practical to design a robust EDR.
AB - Objective. We aimed to fuse the outputs of different electrocardiogram-derived respiration (EDR) algorithms to create one higher quality EDR signal. Methods. We viewed each EDR algorithm as a software sensor that recorded breathing activity from a different vantage point, identified high-quality software sensors based on the respiratory signal quality index, aligned the highest-quality EDRs with a phase synchronization technique based on the graph connection Laplacian, and finally fused those aligned, high-quality EDRs. We refer to the output as the sync-ensembled EDR signal. The proposed algorithm was evaluated on two large-scale databases of whole-night polysomnograms. We evaluated the performance of the proposed algorithm using three respiratory signals recorded from different hardware sensors, and compared it with other existing EDR algorithms. A sensitivity analysis was carried out for a total of five cases: fusion by taking the mean of EDR signals, and the four cases of EDR signal alignment without and with synchronization and without and with signal quality selection. Results. The sync-ensembled EDR algorithm outperforms existing EDR algorithms when evaluated by the synchronized correlation ( γ -score), optimal transport (OT) distance, and estimated average respiratory rate score, all with statistical significance. The sensitivity analysis shows that the signal quality selection and EDR signal alignment are both critical for the performance, both with statistical significance. Conclusion. The sync-ensembled EDR provides robust respiratory information from electrocardiogram. Significance. Phase synchronization is not only theoretically rigorous but also practical to design a robust EDR.
KW - ECG-derived respiration
KW - graph connection laplacian
KW - phase synchronization
KW - respiratory signal quality
KW - sensor fusion
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85189859189&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85189859189&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1088/1361-6579/ad290b
DO - 10.1088/1361-6579/ad290b
M3 - Article
C2 - 38350132
AN - SCOPUS:85189859189
SN - 0967-3334
VL - 45
JO - Physiological Measurement
JF - Physiological Measurement
IS - 3
M1 - 035008
ER -