TY - JOUR
T1 - Uses of Population Health Rankings in Local Policy Contexts
T2 - A Multisite Case Study
AU - Purtle, Jonathan
AU - Peters, Rachel
AU - Kolker, Jennifer
AU - Diez Roux, Ana V.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2017.
PY - 2019/8/1
Y1 - 2019/8/1
N2 - Population health rankings are a common strategy to spur evidence-informed health policy making, but little is known about their uses or impacts. The study aims were to (1) understand how and why the County Health Rankings (CH-Rankings) are used in local policy contexts, (2) identify factors that influence CH-Rankings utilization, and (3) explore potentially negative impacts of the CH-Rankings. Forty-four interviews were conducted with health organization officials and public policy makers in 15 purposively selected counties. The CH-Rankings were used instrumentally to inform internal planning decisions, conceptually to educate the public and policy makers about determinants of population health, and politically to advance organizational agendas. Factors related to organizational capacity, county political ideology, and county rank influenced if, how, and why the CH-Rankings were used. The CH-Rankings sometimes had the negative impacts of promoting potentially ineffective interventions in politically conservative counties and prompting negative media coverage in some counties with poor rank.
AB - Population health rankings are a common strategy to spur evidence-informed health policy making, but little is known about their uses or impacts. The study aims were to (1) understand how and why the County Health Rankings (CH-Rankings) are used in local policy contexts, (2) identify factors that influence CH-Rankings utilization, and (3) explore potentially negative impacts of the CH-Rankings. Forty-four interviews were conducted with health organization officials and public policy makers in 15 purposively selected counties. The CH-Rankings were used instrumentally to inform internal planning decisions, conceptually to educate the public and policy makers about determinants of population health, and politically to advance organizational agendas. Factors related to organizational capacity, county political ideology, and county rank influenced if, how, and why the CH-Rankings were used. The CH-Rankings sometimes had the negative impacts of promoting potentially ineffective interventions in politically conservative counties and prompting negative media coverage in some counties with poor rank.
KW - evidence-informed policy making
KW - population health rankings
KW - qualitative research
KW - uses of research evidence
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85042435432&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85042435432&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/1077558717726115
DO - 10.1177/1077558717726115
M3 - Article
C2 - 29148353
AN - SCOPUS:85042435432
SN - 1077-5587
VL - 76
SP - 478
EP - 496
JO - Medical Care Research and Review
JF - Medical Care Research and Review
IS - 4
ER -