TY - JOUR
T1 - Using a multilevel implementation strategy to facilitate the screening and treatment of tobacco use in the outpatient urology clinic
T2 - A prospective hybrid type I study
AU - Matulewicz, Richard S.
AU - Bassett, Jeffrey C.
AU - Kwan, Lorna
AU - Sherman, Scott E.
AU - McCarthy, William J.
AU - Saigal, Christopher S.
AU - Gore, John L.
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was supported by funds from the Tobacco‐Related Disease Research Program of the University of California (grant 20KT‐0059; principal investigator Jeffrey C. Bassett).
Funding Information:
This research was supported by funds from the Tobacco-Related Disease Research Program of the University of California (grant 20KT-0059; principal investigator Jeffrey C. Bassett).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 American Cancer Society
PY - 2022/3/15
Y1 - 2022/3/15
N2 - Background: Urologists frequently treat patients for tobacco-related conditions but infrequently engage in evidence-based practices (EBPs) that screen for and treat tobacco use. Improving the use of EBPs will help to identify smokers, promote cessation, and improve patients' health outcomes. Methods: A prospective type I hybrid effectiveness-implementation study was performed to test the feasibility and effectiveness of using a multilevel implementation strategy to improve the use of tobacco EBPs. All urology providers at outpatient urology clinics within the Veterans Health Administration Greater Los Angeles and all patients presenting for a new urology consultation were included. The primary outcome was whether a patient was screened for tobacco use at the time of consultation. Secondary outcomes included a patient's willingness to quit, chosen quit strategy, and subsequent engagement in quit attempts. Results: In total, 5706 consecutive veterans were seen for a new consultation during the 30-month study period. Thirty-six percent of all visits were for a tobacco-related urologic diagnosis. The percentage of visits that included tobacco use screening increased from 18% (before implementation) to 57% in the implementation phase and to 60% during the maintenance phase. There was significant provider-level variation in adherence to screening. Of all screened patients, 38% were willing to quit, and most patients chose a “cold turkey” method; 22% of the patients elected referral to a formal smoking cessation clinic, and 24% chose telephone counseling. Among those willing to quit, 39% and 49% made a formal quit attempt by 3 and 6 months, respectively. Conclusions: A strategy that includes provider education and a customized clinical decision support tool can facilitate provider use of tobacco EBPs in a surgery subspecialty clinic.
AB - Background: Urologists frequently treat patients for tobacco-related conditions but infrequently engage in evidence-based practices (EBPs) that screen for and treat tobacco use. Improving the use of EBPs will help to identify smokers, promote cessation, and improve patients' health outcomes. Methods: A prospective type I hybrid effectiveness-implementation study was performed to test the feasibility and effectiveness of using a multilevel implementation strategy to improve the use of tobacco EBPs. All urology providers at outpatient urology clinics within the Veterans Health Administration Greater Los Angeles and all patients presenting for a new urology consultation were included. The primary outcome was whether a patient was screened for tobacco use at the time of consultation. Secondary outcomes included a patient's willingness to quit, chosen quit strategy, and subsequent engagement in quit attempts. Results: In total, 5706 consecutive veterans were seen for a new consultation during the 30-month study period. Thirty-six percent of all visits were for a tobacco-related urologic diagnosis. The percentage of visits that included tobacco use screening increased from 18% (before implementation) to 57% in the implementation phase and to 60% during the maintenance phase. There was significant provider-level variation in adherence to screening. Of all screened patients, 38% were willing to quit, and most patients chose a “cold turkey” method; 22% of the patients elected referral to a formal smoking cessation clinic, and 24% chose telephone counseling. Among those willing to quit, 39% and 49% made a formal quit attempt by 3 and 6 months, respectively. Conclusions: A strategy that includes provider education and a customized clinical decision support tool can facilitate provider use of tobacco EBPs in a surgery subspecialty clinic.
KW - cigarette smoking
KW - implementation science
KW - smoking cessation
KW - urology
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85120629437&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85120629437&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/cncr.34054
DO - 10.1002/cncr.34054
M3 - Article
C2 - 34875105
AN - SCOPUS:85120629437
SN - 0008-543X
VL - 128
SP - 1184
EP - 1193
JO - Cancer
JF - Cancer
IS - 6
ER -