TY - JOUR
T1 - Using a Tabu-search Algorithm and 4D Models to Improve Construction Project Schedules
AU - García de Soto, Borja
AU - Rosarius, Anton
AU - Rieger, Jochen
AU - Chen, Qian
AU - Adey, Bryan T.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 The Authors.
PY - 2017
Y1 - 2017
N2 - Construction project managers are interested in completing their projects on time and within budget. To do that, they often develop project schedules using a set of standardized tools, such as the Program Evaluation and Review Technique (PERT), the Critical Path Method (CPM) and bar charts. Although useful, these tools offer little help regarding the spatial context (i.e., visualization of conflicts among construction activities) as well as determining the optimal schedule with respect to time, cost and resources. The considerations of these two aspects are left to expert opinion, which can sometimes lead to unexpected conflicts during construction and, in turn, result in project delays and added costs. The main steps of the methodology presented here include 1) the determination of optimal schedules using Tabu-search algorithm that accounts for single or multiple objectives (e.g., duration, costs, resources) depending on the project requirements or project management needs, and 2) the integration of project visualization (i.e., 4D models). The visualization of the optimized schedules allows the project team to check the schedule for completeness and to ensure that sequencing and constructability requirements are satisfied. During the visualization process, further refinement of the schedule can be done. The proposed methodology is demonstrated by using it to create the schedule for a one-story steel-frame building. It is shown that the presented methodology results in an improved schedule for the example project over one that may be expected to be generated without this methodology. The best improvements that could be achieve corresponded to a 13% reduction in the project duration, 4% cost reduction, and 49% decrease in resource fluctuation.
AB - Construction project managers are interested in completing their projects on time and within budget. To do that, they often develop project schedules using a set of standardized tools, such as the Program Evaluation and Review Technique (PERT), the Critical Path Method (CPM) and bar charts. Although useful, these tools offer little help regarding the spatial context (i.e., visualization of conflicts among construction activities) as well as determining the optimal schedule with respect to time, cost and resources. The considerations of these two aspects are left to expert opinion, which can sometimes lead to unexpected conflicts during construction and, in turn, result in project delays and added costs. The main steps of the methodology presented here include 1) the determination of optimal schedules using Tabu-search algorithm that accounts for single or multiple objectives (e.g., duration, costs, resources) depending on the project requirements or project management needs, and 2) the integration of project visualization (i.e., 4D models). The visualization of the optimized schedules allows the project team to check the schedule for completeness and to ensure that sequencing and constructability requirements are satisfied. During the visualization process, further refinement of the schedule can be done. The proposed methodology is demonstrated by using it to create the schedule for a one-story steel-frame building. It is shown that the presented methodology results in an improved schedule for the example project over one that may be expected to be generated without this methodology. The best improvements that could be achieve corresponded to a 13% reduction in the project duration, 4% cost reduction, and 49% decrease in resource fluctuation.
KW - 4D modeling technology
KW - PERT
KW - Tabu-search algorithm
KW - critical path method
KW - multi-objective schedule
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85030450976&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85030450976&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.07.236
DO - 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.07.236
M3 - Conference article
AN - SCOPUS:85030450976
SN - 1877-7058
VL - 196
SP - 698
EP - 705
JO - Procedia Engineering
JF - Procedia Engineering
T2 - Creative Construction Conference, CCC 2017
Y2 - 19 June 2017 through 22 June 2017
ER -