Job evaluation has become linked to debates over comparable worth. Proponents of pay equity complain that job evaluation is often biased against predominantly female jobs. Nonetheless, job evaluation is proposed as a tool to achieve more equitable pay for predominantly female jobs. We discuss ways in which conventionally used job evaluation plans incorporate sex bias and how these biases may be minimized. We conclude that, when care is taken to avoid sex bias, job evaluation is the best available tool to achieve pay equity. We predict that its use will grow, particularly in the public sector.
|Original language||English (US)|
|Number of pages||21|
|Journal||International Journal of Public Administration|
|State||Published - Jan 1991|
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Business and International Management
- Public Administration