TY - JOUR
T1 - Using Machine Learning to Predict Axial Pile Capacity
AU - Ozturk, Baturalp
AU - Kodsy, Antonio
AU - Iskander, Magued
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2024.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Accurate estimation of the ultimate axial load bearing capacity of piles is necessary to ensure the safety of the supported structures and to prevent cost overruns. Traditional mechanics-based design methods do not always predict pile capacity accurately, or precisely, leaving room for improvement. This study focuses on the potential of machine learning (ML) in estimating pile capacity. A dataset of 546 load tests was compiled from three databases. The baseline performance of traditional design methods was first established by comparing the capacities computed using four traditional approaches, against the capacities interpreted from load tests using Davisson’s criterion. Sixteen different ML techniques were explored. First, the optimal feature selection technique for model training was investigated. Second, hyperparameters of each technique were optimized. The process involved the training of 32,000 different models and tuning their hyperparameters. Next the dataset was randomly split into training (70%) and testing (30%) for comparing the 16 different ML regression models. Each of the optimized models was then trained using six feature sets. The performance of each of the 16 ML models with the best performing feature subset was compared with the baseline performance from traditional methods. Evaluation criteria included measured versus predicted capacities, influence of soil type on accuracy, as well as the absence of pile diameter, or length effects on accuracy and precision. In general, the ML methods performed significantly better than the best traditional method. The current research demonstrated that ML may offer advantages in geotechnical design when large datasets are available.
AB - Accurate estimation of the ultimate axial load bearing capacity of piles is necessary to ensure the safety of the supported structures and to prevent cost overruns. Traditional mechanics-based design methods do not always predict pile capacity accurately, or precisely, leaving room for improvement. This study focuses on the potential of machine learning (ML) in estimating pile capacity. A dataset of 546 load tests was compiled from three databases. The baseline performance of traditional design methods was first established by comparing the capacities computed using four traditional approaches, against the capacities interpreted from load tests using Davisson’s criterion. Sixteen different ML techniques were explored. First, the optimal feature selection technique for model training was investigated. Second, hyperparameters of each technique were optimized. The process involved the training of 32,000 different models and tuning their hyperparameters. Next the dataset was randomly split into training (70%) and testing (30%) for comparing the 16 different ML regression models. Each of the optimized models was then trained using six feature sets. The performance of each of the 16 ML models with the best performing feature subset was compared with the baseline performance from traditional methods. Evaluation criteria included measured versus predicted capacities, influence of soil type on accuracy, as well as the absence of pile diameter, or length effects on accuracy and precision. In general, the ML methods performed significantly better than the best traditional method. The current research demonstrated that ML may offer advantages in geotechnical design when large datasets are available.
KW - artificial intelligence
KW - data and data science
KW - foundations
KW - infrastructure
KW - machine learning (artificial intelligence)
KW - piles
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85191753360&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85191753360&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/03611981241242762
DO - 10.1177/03611981241242762
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85191753360
SN - 0361-1981
JO - Transportation Research Record
JF - Transportation Research Record
ER -