TY - JOUR
T1 - Validity of the 'ten questions' for screening serious childhood disability
T2 - Results from urban Bangladesh
AU - Zaman, Sultana S.
AU - Khan, Naila Z.
AU - Islam, Shaheen
AU - Banu, Sultana
AU - Dixit, Shanta
AU - Shrout, Patrick
AU - Durkin, Maureen
N1 - Funding Information:
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The study was funded by the BOSTID Program of the National Academy of Sciences (USA), with additional support provided by the Sergievsky Center of Columbia University and the New York State Psychiatric Institute. Dr Zeha Stein has contributed to the research reported in this paper.
PY - 1990/9
Y1 - 1990/9
N2 - Zaman S S (Department of Psychology, University of Dhaka, Bangladesh), Khan N Z, Islam S, Banu S, Dixit S, Shrout P and Durkin M. Validity of the 'Ten Questions' for screening serious childhood disability: results from urban Bangladesh. International Journal of Epidemiology 1990; 19: 613-620.A survey of 2576 children aged two to nine years was carried out in Dhaka, Bangladesh, as part of a collaborative study to test the validity of a questionnaire (the Ten Questions) for screening severe childhood disabilities in community settings. Approximately 7% of the children were positive on the screen and this rate was slightly higher in boys than girls. The sensitivity, specificity and negative predictive value of the Ten Questions were perfect or nearly perfect for severe and moderate (serious) disabilities. The positive predictive value was only 22% for serious disabilities, but 70% of children classified as false positives were found to have mild disabilities or other conditions (such as ear infections) for which early detection and treatment could be beneficial. No major age or gender differences in the validity of the questionnaire were apparent, but this finding needs additional study and confirmation with studies based on larger samples. In general, the results indicate that the Ten Questions is a valid tool for screening serious disabilities in children and can potentially improve the efficiency of health services by reducing the number of children requiring attention from professionals. Future studies using the Ten Questions should foster greater attention to the dimensions of childhood disability as a public health problem in the less developed world.
AB - Zaman S S (Department of Psychology, University of Dhaka, Bangladesh), Khan N Z, Islam S, Banu S, Dixit S, Shrout P and Durkin M. Validity of the 'Ten Questions' for screening serious childhood disability: results from urban Bangladesh. International Journal of Epidemiology 1990; 19: 613-620.A survey of 2576 children aged two to nine years was carried out in Dhaka, Bangladesh, as part of a collaborative study to test the validity of a questionnaire (the Ten Questions) for screening severe childhood disabilities in community settings. Approximately 7% of the children were positive on the screen and this rate was slightly higher in boys than girls. The sensitivity, specificity and negative predictive value of the Ten Questions were perfect or nearly perfect for severe and moderate (serious) disabilities. The positive predictive value was only 22% for serious disabilities, but 70% of children classified as false positives were found to have mild disabilities or other conditions (such as ear infections) for which early detection and treatment could be beneficial. No major age or gender differences in the validity of the questionnaire were apparent, but this finding needs additional study and confirmation with studies based on larger samples. In general, the results indicate that the Ten Questions is a valid tool for screening serious disabilities in children and can potentially improve the efficiency of health services by reducing the number of children requiring attention from professionals. Future studies using the Ten Questions should foster greater attention to the dimensions of childhood disability as a public health problem in the less developed world.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0025169440&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0025169440&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/ije/19.3.613
DO - 10.1093/ije/19.3.613
M3 - Article
C2 - 2148168
AN - SCOPUS:0025169440
SN - 0300-5771
VL - 19
SP - 613
EP - 620
JO - International Journal of Epidemiology
JF - International Journal of Epidemiology
IS - 3
ER -