Variability and limits of US state laws regulating workplace wellness programs

Jennifer L. Pomeranz, Andrea M. Garcia, Randy Vesprey, Adam Davey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

We examined variability in state laws related to workplace wellness programs for public and private employers. We conducted legal research using LexisNexis and Westlaw to create a master list of US state laws that existed in 2014 dedicated to workplace wellness programs. The master list was then divided into laws focusing on public employers and private employers. We created 2 codebooks to describe the variables used to examine the laws. Coders used LawAtlasSM Workbench tocodethe laws related to workplace wellness programs. Thirty-two states and the District of Columbia had laws related to workplace wellness programs in 2014.Sixteen states and the District of Columbia had laws dedicated to public employers, and16stateshad laws dedicated to private employers. Nine states and the District of Columbia had laws that did not specify employer type. State laws varied greatly in their methods of encouraging or shaping wellness program requirements. Few states have comprehensive requirements or incentives to support evidence-based workplace wellness programs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1028-1031
Number of pages4
JournalAmerican Journal of Public Health
Volume106
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2016

Fingerprint

Health Promotion
Workplace
Motivation
Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Variability and limits of US state laws regulating workplace wellness programs. / Pomeranz, Jennifer L.; Garcia, Andrea M.; Vesprey, Randy; Davey, Adam.

In: American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 106, No. 6, 01.06.2016, p. 1028-1031.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Pomeranz, Jennifer L. ; Garcia, Andrea M. ; Vesprey, Randy ; Davey, Adam. / Variability and limits of US state laws regulating workplace wellness programs. In: American Journal of Public Health. 2016 ; Vol. 106, No. 6. pp. 1028-1031.
@article{f00a0bfc35064ec4b16ef557d10a50e2,
title = "Variability and limits of US state laws regulating workplace wellness programs",
abstract = "We examined variability in state laws related to workplace wellness programs for public and private employers. We conducted legal research using LexisNexis and Westlaw to create a master list of US state laws that existed in 2014 dedicated to workplace wellness programs. The master list was then divided into laws focusing on public employers and private employers. We created 2 codebooks to describe the variables used to examine the laws. Coders used LawAtlasSM Workbench tocodethe laws related to workplace wellness programs. Thirty-two states and the District of Columbia had laws related to workplace wellness programs in 2014.Sixteen states and the District of Columbia had laws dedicated to public employers, and16stateshad laws dedicated to private employers. Nine states and the District of Columbia had laws that did not specify employer type. State laws varied greatly in their methods of encouraging or shaping wellness program requirements. Few states have comprehensive requirements or incentives to support evidence-based workplace wellness programs.",
author = "Pomeranz, {Jennifer L.} and Garcia, {Andrea M.} and Randy Vesprey and Adam Davey",
year = "2016",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2105/AJPH.2016.303144",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "106",
pages = "1028--1031",
journal = "American Journal of Public Health",
issn = "0090-0036",
publisher = "American Public Health Association Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Variability and limits of US state laws regulating workplace wellness programs

AU - Pomeranz, Jennifer L.

AU - Garcia, Andrea M.

AU - Vesprey, Randy

AU - Davey, Adam

PY - 2016/6/1

Y1 - 2016/6/1

N2 - We examined variability in state laws related to workplace wellness programs for public and private employers. We conducted legal research using LexisNexis and Westlaw to create a master list of US state laws that existed in 2014 dedicated to workplace wellness programs. The master list was then divided into laws focusing on public employers and private employers. We created 2 codebooks to describe the variables used to examine the laws. Coders used LawAtlasSM Workbench tocodethe laws related to workplace wellness programs. Thirty-two states and the District of Columbia had laws related to workplace wellness programs in 2014.Sixteen states and the District of Columbia had laws dedicated to public employers, and16stateshad laws dedicated to private employers. Nine states and the District of Columbia had laws that did not specify employer type. State laws varied greatly in their methods of encouraging or shaping wellness program requirements. Few states have comprehensive requirements or incentives to support evidence-based workplace wellness programs.

AB - We examined variability in state laws related to workplace wellness programs for public and private employers. We conducted legal research using LexisNexis and Westlaw to create a master list of US state laws that existed in 2014 dedicated to workplace wellness programs. The master list was then divided into laws focusing on public employers and private employers. We created 2 codebooks to describe the variables used to examine the laws. Coders used LawAtlasSM Workbench tocodethe laws related to workplace wellness programs. Thirty-two states and the District of Columbia had laws related to workplace wellness programs in 2014.Sixteen states and the District of Columbia had laws dedicated to public employers, and16stateshad laws dedicated to private employers. Nine states and the District of Columbia had laws that did not specify employer type. State laws varied greatly in their methods of encouraging or shaping wellness program requirements. Few states have comprehensive requirements or incentives to support evidence-based workplace wellness programs.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84968902210&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84968902210&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2105/AJPH.2016.303144

DO - 10.2105/AJPH.2016.303144

M3 - Article

C2 - 27077349

AN - SCOPUS:84968902210

VL - 106

SP - 1028

EP - 1031

JO - American Journal of Public Health

JF - American Journal of Public Health

SN - 0090-0036

IS - 6

ER -