Varying Intensity of Judicial Review: A Conceptual Analysis

Paul Craig

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debatepeer-review


It is generally acknowledged that the intensity of judicial review varies. The first half of this article provides the conceptual architecture of the different factors that shape the intensity of review, drawing on doctrine from UK, US and EU law. This provides the foundation for the second part of the article, which critiques argumentation concerning variation in proportionality review.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)442-446
Number of pages5
JournalPublic law
Issue number3
StatePublished - Jul 2022


  • Burden of proof
  • Comparative law
  • EU law
  • Judicial review
  • Jurisprudence
  • Proportionality
  • Review grounds
  • Standard of proof
  • United States

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Law


Dive into the research topics of 'Varying Intensity of Judicial Review: A Conceptual Analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this