Varying Intensity of Judicial Review: A Conceptual Analysis

Paul Craig

doi:10.2139/ssrn.4066564

Varying Intensity of Judicial Review: A Conceptual Analysis

Paul Craig

Legal Studies

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review

Abstract

It is generally acknowledged that the intensity of judicial review varies. The first half of this article provides the conceptual architecture of the different factors that shape the intensity of review, drawing on doctrine from UK, US and EU law. This provides the foundation for the second part of the article, which critiques argumentation concerning variation in proportionality review.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	442-446
Number of pages	5
Journal	Public law
Volume	2022
Issue number	3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4066564
State	Published - Jul 2022

Keywords

Burden of proof
Comparative law
EU law
Judicial review
Jurisprudence
Proportionality
Review grounds
Standard of proof
United States

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Law

Access to Document

10.2139/ssrn.4066564

Cite this

@article{f66ecba642b24173b890de747fc7fb20,

title = "Varying Intensity of Judicial Review: A Conceptual Analysis",

abstract = "It is generally acknowledged that the intensity of judicial review varies. The first half of this article provides the conceptual architecture of the different factors that shape the intensity of review, drawing on doctrine from UK, US and EU law. This provides the foundation for the second part of the article, which critiques argumentation concerning variation in proportionality review.",

keywords = "Burden of proof, Comparative law, EU law, Judicial review, Jurisprudence, Proportionality, Review grounds, Standard of proof, United States",

author = "Paul Craig",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2022 Thomson Reuters and Contributors.",

year = "2022",

month = jul,

doi = "10.2139/ssrn.4066564",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "2022",

pages = "442--446",

journal = "Public law",

issn = "0033-3565",

publisher = "Sweet and Maxwell-Thomson Reuters",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Varying Intensity of Judicial Review

T2 - A Conceptual Analysis

AU - Craig, Paul

PY - 2022/7

Y1 - 2022/7

N2 - It is generally acknowledged that the intensity of judicial review varies. The first half of this article provides the conceptual architecture of the different factors that shape the intensity of review, drawing on doctrine from UK, US and EU law. This provides the foundation for the second part of the article, which critiques argumentation concerning variation in proportionality review.

AB - It is generally acknowledged that the intensity of judicial review varies. The first half of this article provides the conceptual architecture of the different factors that shape the intensity of review, drawing on doctrine from UK, US and EU law. This provides the foundation for the second part of the article, which critiques argumentation concerning variation in proportionality review.

KW - Burden of proof

KW - Comparative law

KW - EU law

KW - Judicial review

KW - Jurisprudence

KW - Proportionality

KW - Review grounds

KW - Standard of proof

KW - United States

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85133260952&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85133260952&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2139/ssrn.4066564

DO - 10.2139/ssrn.4066564

M3 - Comment/debate

AN - SCOPUS:85133260952

SN - 0033-3565

VL - 2022

SP - 442

EP - 446

JO - Public law

JF - Public law

IS - 3

ER -

Varying Intensity of Judicial Review: A Conceptual Analysis

Abstract

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this