Violence, publicity, and sovereignty: Lawlessness in Mumbai

Arvind Rajagopal

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


Lawless violence often preceded the rule of law. British sovereignty depended on non-state actors such as the East India Company, whose lawless acts provoked the demand in the British Parliament for the rule of law. Contemporary terrorism marks a time when lawless violence proliferates and territorial boundaries are infringed upon, when state leaders invoke 'non-state actors' and argue for the need to respond in kind. Today the state mimics the behavior of private parties, justifying violence as revenge and practicing torture as the just desserts of terrorists. If one intention of terrorism is to drive a wedge between the law and its representation, and unsettle our understanding of the relationship between violence and visibility, state responses to terrorism such as in Mumbai confirm that public spaces can become zones of suspended legality.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)411-416
Number of pages6
JournalSocial Identities
Issue number3
StatePublished - 2009


  • Democracy
  • Lawless violence
  • Media
  • Mumbai
  • Non-state actors
  • Politics of humanity
  • Sovereignty

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science


Dive into the research topics of 'Violence, publicity, and sovereignty: Lawlessness in Mumbai'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this