Vowel nasalization does not cue ambisyllabicity in American English nasals: Evidence from nasometrya)

Sarah Rose Bellavance, Amanda Eads, Aidan Katson, José Álvarez Retamales, Alden McCollum, Auromita Mitra, Lisa Davidson

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Using visual spectrographic examination of vowel nasalization to diagnose the syllabic affiliation of phonologically ambisyllabic nasal consonants (e.g., gamma), Durvasula and Huang [(2017). Lang. Sci. 62, 17-36] argued that anticipatory vowel nasalization in these words patterns with word-medial codas. Using nasometry, the current study finds that anticipatory nasalization before monomorphemic and multimorphemic (scammer) ambisyllabic nasals differ from word-medial coda (gamble) and word-final nasals (scam), but not from other intervocalic nasals. Additionally, vowel nasalization is sensitive to the manner of the preceding phoneme. These findings demonstrate that quantifying anticipatory nasalization using nasometry differs from visual spectrographic criteria.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Article number070001
    JournalJASA Express Letters
    Volume4
    Issue number7
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Jul 1 2024

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Acoustics and Ultrasonics
    • Music
    • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Vowel nasalization does not cue ambisyllabicity in American English nasals: Evidence from nasometrya)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this