Weak islands and an algebraic semantics for scope taking

Anna Szabolcsi, Frans Zwarts

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter (peer-reviewed)peer-review


    Modifying the descriptive and theoretical generalizations of Relativized Minimality, we argue that a significant subset of weak island violations arise when an extracted phrase should scope over some intervener but is unable to. Harmless interveners seem harmless because they can support an alternative reading. This paper focuses on why certain wh-phrases are poor wide scope takers, and offers an algebraic perspective on scope interaction. Each scopal element SE is associated with certain operations (e.g., not with complements). When a wh-phrase scopes over some SE, the operations associated with that SE are performed in its denotation domain. The requisite operations may or may not be available in a domain, however. We present an empirical analysis of a variety of wh-phrases. It is argued that the wh-phrases that escape all weak islands (i.e., can scope over any intervener) are those that range over individuals, the reason being that all Boolean operations are defined for their domain. Collectives, manners, amounts, numbers, etc. all denote in domains with fewer operations and are thus selectively sensitive to scopal interveners-a "semantic relativized minimality effect". © 1993 Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Title of host publicationWays of Scope Taking
    Editors Szabolcsi, Kluwer
    Place of PublicationColumbus, Ohio
    PublisherOSU WPL
    StatePublished - 1997

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Linguistics and Language


    Dive into the research topics of 'Weak islands and an algebraic semantics for scope taking'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this