Abstract
Through analysis of stock responses to two different types of banking M&A deals, specifying M&A and diversifying M&A, we find that specifying M&A deals incur positive cumulative abnormal returns (CAR) in both two-day and three-day windows without controlling for firm size. Diversifying M&A deals incur positive CAR in two different event windows. However, the differences between the two windows are not statistically significant. Contrary to previous studies on M&A in the banking industry of developed markets, the results of our study indicate that markets do not distinguish among various types of M&A deals in the banking industry around the date of announcement. Diversifying M&A generate positive three-day CARs but they are not significantly better than specifying M&A.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 47-58 |
Number of pages | 12 |
Journal | Journal of Applied Business Research |
Volume | 28 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 2012 |
Keywords
- Asian emerging markets
- Banks
- Mergers and Acquisitions
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Business and International Management