Welfare caseload change: An alternative approach

Lawrence M. Mead

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


    In the last decade, caseloads in AFDC/TANF have shifted dramatically up, then down. Of existing studies based on time series or state panel data, some tend to underplay the role of welfare reform. All say little about what policies drove the decline or about the role of governmental quality. An approach using cross-sectional models explains interstate differences in caseload change rather than the national trend but allows more discussion about the role of policy and government. Results suggest that grant levels, work and child support requirements, and sanctions are important explainers of change, along with some demographic terms and unemployment. These policies in turn are tied to states' political opinion, political culture, and institutional capacity. Moralistic states seem the most capable of transforming welfare in the manner the public wants.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)163-185
    Number of pages23
    JournalPolicy Studies Journal
    Issue number2
    StatePublished - May 2003

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Sociology and Political Science
    • Public Administration
    • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law


    Dive into the research topics of 'Welfare caseload change: An alternative approach'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this