TY - JOUR
T1 - Welfare states and social mobility
T2 - How educational and social policy may affect cross-national differences in the association between occupational origins and destinations
AU - Beller, Emily
AU - Hout, Michael
N1 - Funding Information:
We presented the first version of this paper at the spring meeting of the International Sociological Association's research committee on social stratification and mobility (RC28), Oslo, Norway, 6 May 2005. We thank the Survey Research Center and the Committee on Research at the University of California, Berkeley, for financial support. Each author contributed equally to the paper; we list our names alphabetically.
PY - 2006
Y1 - 2006
N2 - Cross-national differences in the association between origins and destinations correspond to differences in both welfare regime type and access to post-secondary education. Socialist and social democratic welfare regimes foster a weaker origin-destination association than liberal, corporatist, or mixed regimes do. Nations with better-educated labor forces tend to also be the nations where the association between origins and destinations is weakest. Furthermore, the social and educational policy interact so that the tendency for educational access to lower the origin-destination association is most pronounced in the liberal welfare setting where the association would otherwise be greatest. Greater access is not necessarily associated with greater equality of opportunity, and we find very weak evidence that equality of educational opportunity itself is a direct influence on equality of occupational opportunity (even though nations that have a strong origin-education association also have a strong origin-destination association).
AB - Cross-national differences in the association between origins and destinations correspond to differences in both welfare regime type and access to post-secondary education. Socialist and social democratic welfare regimes foster a weaker origin-destination association than liberal, corporatist, or mixed regimes do. Nations with better-educated labor forces tend to also be the nations where the association between origins and destinations is weakest. Furthermore, the social and educational policy interact so that the tendency for educational access to lower the origin-destination association is most pronounced in the liberal welfare setting where the association would otherwise be greatest. Greater access is not necessarily associated with greater equality of opportunity, and we find very weak evidence that equality of educational opportunity itself is a direct influence on equality of occupational opportunity (even though nations that have a strong origin-education association also have a strong origin-destination association).
KW - Educational opportunity
KW - Mobility
KW - Welfare state
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33845994750&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33845994750&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.rssm.2006.10.001
DO - 10.1016/j.rssm.2006.10.001
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:33845994750
SN - 0276-5624
VL - 24
SP - 353
EP - 365
JO - Research in Social Stratification and Mobility
JF - Research in Social Stratification and Mobility
IS - 4
ER -