TY - JOUR
T1 - “We’re a Little Different:” Business Information Literacy Perspectives on the ACRL Framework
AU - Click, Amanda B.
AU - Wiley, Claire Walker
AU - Houlihan, Meggan A.
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by the BRASS (Business Reference and Services Section) Emerald Research Award.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, Communications in Information Literacy. All rights reserved.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - The introduction of the ACRL Framework for Information Literacy in Higher Education in 2015 inspired many librarians to rethink how they offer information literacy instruction. This multi-method study, using data from a survey and five focus groups, explores the use of the Framework in business information literacy (BIL). The study research questions focus on how librarians engage with the Framework in supporting the information needs of business students. Participants indicate that they make implicit, direct, and institutional use of the Framework. They also use a variety of tools aside from the Framework when designing their BIL instruction. Limitations of the Framework include the language of the document and irrelevance to some disciplinary contexts; librarians also struggle with meeting faculty expectations and finding the time for implementation. However, they find “Authority Is Constructed and Contextual,” “Information Has Value,” and “Searching as Strategic Exploration” to be the most useful frames for BIL instruction.
AB - The introduction of the ACRL Framework for Information Literacy in Higher Education in 2015 inspired many librarians to rethink how they offer information literacy instruction. This multi-method study, using data from a survey and five focus groups, explores the use of the Framework in business information literacy (BIL). The study research questions focus on how librarians engage with the Framework in supporting the information needs of business students. Participants indicate that they make implicit, direct, and institutional use of the Framework. They also use a variety of tools aside from the Framework when designing their BIL instruction. Limitations of the Framework include the language of the document and irrelevance to some disciplinary contexts; librarians also struggle with meeting faculty expectations and finding the time for implementation. However, they find “Authority Is Constructed and Contextual,” “Information Has Value,” and “Searching as Strategic Exploration” to be the most useful frames for BIL instruction.
KW - ACRL framework
KW - Business information literacy
KW - Focus groups
KW - Information literacy instruction
KW - Librarian perceptions
KW - Survey
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85109643704&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85109643704&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.15760/comminfolit.2021.15.1.2
DO - 10.15760/comminfolit.2021.15.1.2
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85109643704
SN - 1933-5954
VL - 15
SP - 24
EP - 56
JO - Communications in Information Literacy
JF - Communications in Information Literacy
IS - 1
ER -