What is ethnic identity and does it matter?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Since the publication of Horowitz's Ethnic Groups in Conflict, comparative political scientists have increasingly converged on their classification of ethnic identities. But there is no agreement on the definition that justifies this classification and the definitions that individual scholars propose do not match their classifications. I propose a definition that captures the conventional classification of ethnic identities in comparative political science to a greater degree than the alternatives. According to this definition, ethnic identities are a subset of identity categories in which membership is determined by attributes associated with, or believed to be associated with, descent (described here simply as descent-based attributes). I argue, on the basis of this definition, that ethnicity either does not matter or has not been shown to matter in explaining most outcomes to which it has been causally linked by comparative political scientists. These outcomes include violence, democratic stability, and patronage.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)397-424
Number of pages28
JournalAnnual Review of Political Science
Volume9
DOIs
StatePublished - 2006

Fingerprint

ethnic identity
political scientist
comparative political science
clientelism
ethnic group
ethnicity
violence

Keywords

  • Culture
  • Democracy
  • Ethnicity
  • Patronage
  • Violence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

What is ethnic identity and does it matter? / Chandra, Kanchan.

In: Annual Review of Political Science, Vol. 9, 2006, p. 397-424.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{94cc6751b0f74b29a7212de5a1969a3e,
title = "What is ethnic identity and does it matter?",
abstract = "Since the publication of Horowitz's Ethnic Groups in Conflict, comparative political scientists have increasingly converged on their classification of ethnic identities. But there is no agreement on the definition that justifies this classification and the definitions that individual scholars propose do not match their classifications. I propose a definition that captures the conventional classification of ethnic identities in comparative political science to a greater degree than the alternatives. According to this definition, ethnic identities are a subset of identity categories in which membership is determined by attributes associated with, or believed to be associated with, descent (described here simply as descent-based attributes). I argue, on the basis of this definition, that ethnicity either does not matter or has not been shown to matter in explaining most outcomes to which it has been causally linked by comparative political scientists. These outcomes include violence, democratic stability, and patronage.",
keywords = "Culture, Democracy, Ethnicity, Patronage, Violence",
author = "Kanchan Chandra",
year = "2006",
doi = "10.1146/annurev.polisci.9.062404.170715",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
pages = "397--424",
journal = "Annual Review of Political Science",
issn = "1094-2939",
publisher = "Annual Reviews Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - What is ethnic identity and does it matter?

AU - Chandra, Kanchan

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - Since the publication of Horowitz's Ethnic Groups in Conflict, comparative political scientists have increasingly converged on their classification of ethnic identities. But there is no agreement on the definition that justifies this classification and the definitions that individual scholars propose do not match their classifications. I propose a definition that captures the conventional classification of ethnic identities in comparative political science to a greater degree than the alternatives. According to this definition, ethnic identities are a subset of identity categories in which membership is determined by attributes associated with, or believed to be associated with, descent (described here simply as descent-based attributes). I argue, on the basis of this definition, that ethnicity either does not matter or has not been shown to matter in explaining most outcomes to which it has been causally linked by comparative political scientists. These outcomes include violence, democratic stability, and patronage.

AB - Since the publication of Horowitz's Ethnic Groups in Conflict, comparative political scientists have increasingly converged on their classification of ethnic identities. But there is no agreement on the definition that justifies this classification and the definitions that individual scholars propose do not match their classifications. I propose a definition that captures the conventional classification of ethnic identities in comparative political science to a greater degree than the alternatives. According to this definition, ethnic identities are a subset of identity categories in which membership is determined by attributes associated with, or believed to be associated with, descent (described here simply as descent-based attributes). I argue, on the basis of this definition, that ethnicity either does not matter or has not been shown to matter in explaining most outcomes to which it has been causally linked by comparative political scientists. These outcomes include violence, democratic stability, and patronage.

KW - Culture

KW - Democracy

KW - Ethnicity

KW - Patronage

KW - Violence

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33745789246&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33745789246&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1146/annurev.polisci.9.062404.170715

DO - 10.1146/annurev.polisci.9.062404.170715

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 397

EP - 424

JO - Annual Review of Political Science

JF - Annual Review of Political Science

SN - 1094-2939

ER -