When White Men Can't Do Math: Necessary and Sufficient Factors in Stereotype Threat

Joshua Aronson, Michael J. Lustina, Catherine Good, Kelli Keough, Claude M. Steele, Joseph Brown

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Research on "stereotype threat" (Aronson, Quinn, & Spencer, 1998; Steele, 1997; Steele & Aronson, 1995) suggests that the social stigma of intellectual inferiority borne by certain cultural minorities can undermine the standardized test performance and school outcomes of members of these groups. This research tested two assumptions about the necessary conditions for stereotype threat to impair intellectual test performance. First, we tested the hypothesis that to interfere with performance, stereotype threat requires neither a history of stigmatization nor internalized feelings of intellectual inferiority, but can arise and become disruptive as a result of situational pressures alone. Two experiments tested this notion with participants for whom no stereotype of low ability exists in the domain we tested and who, in fact, were selected for high ability in that domain (math-proficient white males). In Study 1 we induced stereotype threat by invoking a comparison with a minority group stereotyped to excel at math (Asians). As predicted, these stereotype-threatened white males performed worse on a difficult math test than a nonstereotype-threatened control group. Study 2 replicated this effect and further tested the assumption that stereotype threat is in part mediated by domain identification and, therefore, most likely to undermine the performances of individuals who are highly identified with the domain being tested. The results are discussed in terms of their implications for the development of stereotype threat theory as well as for standardized testing.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)29-46
Number of pages18
JournalJournal of Experimental Social Psychology
Volume35
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1999

Fingerprint

stereotype
threat
Social Stigma
Stereotyping
Minority Groups
Emotions
performance
measurement method
Caucasian
test
minority
research
stigmatization
stigma
Asian
identification
hypothesis
man
membership
experiment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology

Cite this

When White Men Can't Do Math : Necessary and Sufficient Factors in Stereotype Threat. / Aronson, Joshua; Lustina, Michael J.; Good, Catherine; Keough, Kelli; Steele, Claude M.; Brown, Joseph.

In: Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 35, No. 1, 01.1999, p. 29-46.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Aronson, Joshua; Lustina, Michael J.; Good, Catherine; Keough, Kelli; Steele, Claude M.; Brown, Joseph / When White Men Can't Do Math : Necessary and Sufficient Factors in Stereotype Threat.

In: Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 35, No. 1, 01.1999, p. 29-46.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{37f7d9a16e394f59b372387d52ce9a9f,
title = "When White Men Can't Do Math: Necessary and Sufficient Factors in Stereotype Threat",
abstract = "Research on {"}stereotype threat{"} (Aronson, Quinn, & Spencer, 1998; Steele, 1997; Steele & Aronson, 1995) suggests that the social stigma of intellectual inferiority borne by certain cultural minorities can undermine the standardized test performance and school outcomes of members of these groups. This research tested two assumptions about the necessary conditions for stereotype threat to impair intellectual test performance. First, we tested the hypothesis that to interfere with performance, stereotype threat requires neither a history of stigmatization nor internalized feelings of intellectual inferiority, but can arise and become disruptive as a result of situational pressures alone. Two experiments tested this notion with participants for whom no stereotype of low ability exists in the domain we tested and who, in fact, were selected for high ability in that domain (math-proficient white males). In Study 1 we induced stereotype threat by invoking a comparison with a minority group stereotyped to excel at math (Asians). As predicted, these stereotype-threatened white males performed worse on a difficult math test than a nonstereotype-threatened control group. Study 2 replicated this effect and further tested the assumption that stereotype threat is in part mediated by domain identification and, therefore, most likely to undermine the performances of individuals who are highly identified with the domain being tested. The results are discussed in terms of their implications for the development of stereotype threat theory as well as for standardized testing.",
author = "Joshua Aronson and Lustina, {Michael J.} and Catherine Good and Kelli Keough and Steele, {Claude M.} and Joseph Brown",
year = "1999",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1006/jesp.1998.1371",
volume = "35",
pages = "29--46",
journal = "Journal of Experimental Social Psychology",
issn = "0022-1031",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - When White Men Can't Do Math

T2 - Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

AU - Aronson,Joshua

AU - Lustina,Michael J.

AU - Good,Catherine

AU - Keough,Kelli

AU - Steele,Claude M.

AU - Brown,Joseph

PY - 1999/1

Y1 - 1999/1

N2 - Research on "stereotype threat" (Aronson, Quinn, & Spencer, 1998; Steele, 1997; Steele & Aronson, 1995) suggests that the social stigma of intellectual inferiority borne by certain cultural minorities can undermine the standardized test performance and school outcomes of members of these groups. This research tested two assumptions about the necessary conditions for stereotype threat to impair intellectual test performance. First, we tested the hypothesis that to interfere with performance, stereotype threat requires neither a history of stigmatization nor internalized feelings of intellectual inferiority, but can arise and become disruptive as a result of situational pressures alone. Two experiments tested this notion with participants for whom no stereotype of low ability exists in the domain we tested and who, in fact, were selected for high ability in that domain (math-proficient white males). In Study 1 we induced stereotype threat by invoking a comparison with a minority group stereotyped to excel at math (Asians). As predicted, these stereotype-threatened white males performed worse on a difficult math test than a nonstereotype-threatened control group. Study 2 replicated this effect and further tested the assumption that stereotype threat is in part mediated by domain identification and, therefore, most likely to undermine the performances of individuals who are highly identified with the domain being tested. The results are discussed in terms of their implications for the development of stereotype threat theory as well as for standardized testing.

AB - Research on "stereotype threat" (Aronson, Quinn, & Spencer, 1998; Steele, 1997; Steele & Aronson, 1995) suggests that the social stigma of intellectual inferiority borne by certain cultural minorities can undermine the standardized test performance and school outcomes of members of these groups. This research tested two assumptions about the necessary conditions for stereotype threat to impair intellectual test performance. First, we tested the hypothesis that to interfere with performance, stereotype threat requires neither a history of stigmatization nor internalized feelings of intellectual inferiority, but can arise and become disruptive as a result of situational pressures alone. Two experiments tested this notion with participants for whom no stereotype of low ability exists in the domain we tested and who, in fact, were selected for high ability in that domain (math-proficient white males). In Study 1 we induced stereotype threat by invoking a comparison with a minority group stereotyped to excel at math (Asians). As predicted, these stereotype-threatened white males performed worse on a difficult math test than a nonstereotype-threatened control group. Study 2 replicated this effect and further tested the assumption that stereotype threat is in part mediated by domain identification and, therefore, most likely to undermine the performances of individuals who are highly identified with the domain being tested. The results are discussed in terms of their implications for the development of stereotype threat theory as well as for standardized testing.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033480694&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033480694&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1006/jesp.1998.1371

DO - 10.1006/jesp.1998.1371

M3 - Article

VL - 35

SP - 29

EP - 46

JO - Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

JF - Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

SN - 0022-1031

IS - 1

ER -