TY - JOUR
T1 - Which Students Benefit from Computer-Based Individualized Instruction? Experimental Evidence from Public Schools in India
AU - de Barros, Andreas
AU - Ganimian, Alejandro J.
N1 - Funding Information:
We gratefully acknowledge the funding provided by the Douglas B. Marshall, Jr. Family Foundation for this project. We especially thank Karthik Muralidharan for his involvement as a collaborator in the early stages of this project and for subsequent discussions. We thank Pranav Kothari, Aarthi Muralidharan, Sridhar Rajagopalan, Maulik Shah, Nishchal Shukla, and Gayatri Vaidya for making this study possible. We also thank Anuja Venkatachalam for excellent research assistance and field support. This study was registered with the AEA Trial Registry (RCT ID: AEARCTR-0002459). The usual disclaimers apply.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - This is one of the first studies to evaluate the impact of computer-based individualized instruction in a developing country. We randomly assigned 1,528 students in grades 6–8 in 15 “model” public schools in Rajasthan, India who were using a computer-adaptive learning software to: a control group, in which they were only able to access the activities for their enrolled grade level; or a treatment group, in which they were able to access exercises appropriate for their performance level. After 9 months, computer-based individualized instruction had a null average effect on math achievement. However, treatment students with low initial performance outperformed their control counterparts by 0.22 standard deviations. Our results suggest that computer-based individualized instruction is most beneficial for low-performing students.
AB - This is one of the first studies to evaluate the impact of computer-based individualized instruction in a developing country. We randomly assigned 1,528 students in grades 6–8 in 15 “model” public schools in Rajasthan, India who were using a computer-adaptive learning software to: a control group, in which they were only able to access the activities for their enrolled grade level; or a treatment group, in which they were able to access exercises appropriate for their performance level. After 9 months, computer-based individualized instruction had a null average effect on math achievement. However, treatment students with low initial performance outperformed their control counterparts by 0.22 standard deviations. Our results suggest that computer-based individualized instruction is most beneficial for low-performing students.
KW - Computer-aided learning
KW - computer-based individualized instruction
KW - India
KW - math instruction
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85151990932&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85151990932&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/19345747.2023.2191604
DO - 10.1080/19345747.2023.2191604
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85151990932
SN - 1934-5747
JO - Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness
JF - Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness
ER -