Why Ethnic Subaltern-Led Parties Crowd Out Armed Organizations: Explaining Maoist Violence in India

Kanchan Chandra, Omar García-Ponce

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This article asks why some Indian districts experience chronic Maoist violence while others do not. The answer helps to explain India's Maoist civil war, which is the product of the accumulation of violence in a few districts, as well as to generate a new hypothesis about the causes of civil war more generally. The authors argue that, other things equal, the emergence of subaltern-led parties at the critical juncture before armed organizations enter crowds them out: the stronger the presence of subaltern-led political parties in a district at this juncture, the lower the likelihood of experiencing chronic armed violence subsequently. They develop their argument through field research and test its main prediction using an original, district-level data set on subaltern incorporation and Maoist violence in India between 1967 and 2008. The article contributes a new, party-based explanation to the literatures on both civil war and Maoist violence in India. It also introduces new district-level data on the Maoist movement and on the incorporation of subaltern ethnic groups by political parties in India.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)367-416
Number of pages50
JournalWorld Politics
Volume71
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2019

Keywords

  • India
  • Maoist
  • Wordscivil war
  • clientelism
  • ethnic parties
  • left
  • parties
  • patronage
  • violence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Political Science and International Relations

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Why Ethnic Subaltern-Led Parties Crowd Out Armed Organizations: Explaining Maoist Violence in India'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this