Abstract
Andrews et al.'s analysis suffers from a series of conceptual confusions they inherit from Gould's work. Their proposal that adaptations can be distinguished from exaptations essentially by specific design criteria fails because exaptations are often maintained and secondarily adapted by natural selection and therefore, over evolutionary time, can come to have similar levels of design specificity to adaptations.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 532-533 |
Number of pages | 2 |
Journal | Behavioral and Brain Sciences |
Volume | 25 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs |
|
State | Published - Aug 2002 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
- Physiology
- Behavioral Neuroscience